Keyword: «criminal liability»

The article analyzes the current state of criminal law regulation of cyberbullying against minors in Russia and abroad. The key problems of qualification, latency and prevention of this phenomenon are considered, as well as measures to improve legislation based on a comparative legal approach are proposed.

This article focuses on the analysis of the problems that arise when applying the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution and the execution of a sentence in the judicial and investigative practice of the Russian Federation. By examining Article 78 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the article identifies its controversial aspects and analyzes the difficulties associated with the calculation, suspension, and interruption of the statute of limitations, as well as with the voluntary refusal to apply it and the exceptions to the general rule. The article emphasizes the need for unification of law enforcement practices and suggests possible ways to improve the legislation.

The article is devoted to rehabilitation in criminal proceedings as a comprehensive legal institution aimed at restoring the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of persons who have been unlawfully or unreasonably subjected to criminal prosecution. It is concluded that the legal nature of rehabilitation lies in its dual nature: on the one hand, it is a guarantee of constitutional human rights enshrined in the Basic Law of the State, and on the other, it acts as a procedural mechanism that is regulated by the norms of criminal procedure law.

The article is devoted to the institution of voluntary non-commission of a crime, a review of non-commission of a crime with complicity is conducted, and a conclusion is drawn about the importance of this institution in Russian criminal law.