Keyword: «modern russian language»

The article examines the origin of slang expressions and their meaning in modern culture. Creating a classification of slang depending on their etymology. As well as the analysis of modern words and idioms used in slang and their further classification.

The article examines the newest units of youth slang in the modern Russian language. Their use by young people is analyzed using the material of the social network "VKontakte". It is noted that they are used in Internet communication very often and serve various purposes. With their help, young people describe relationship problems, characterize and evaluate themselves and others, express feelings. Not only the functions of slangisms are diverse, but also the methods of their formation.

The article examines the use of words and combinations related to the thematic sphere of artificial intelligence (AI) by users of the social network "VKontakte". It is noted that users often turn to this vocabulary, while the set of language units is not very large. The most frequently used lexemes are artificial intelligence, AI and neural network, although rarer terms are also encountered. Functional analysis shows that most often with the help of AI vocabulary, the speaker communicates some information to the addressees. A positive assessment of AI and related phenomena often has an advertising focus. A negative assessment is associated with doubts about the safety of AI for humans.

This article examines the use of the lexeme "device" by modern Russian speakers. It is noted that the word "device" has become a firmly established language element, becoming a convenient communication tool. The lexeme gradually acquires new semantic nuances and acquires a metaphorical character, which serves as a clear indicator of its successful assimilation into the Russian language. Its widespread use in various speech situations – from fiction and journalism to everyday conversation – testifies to the vitality and flexibility of our language, its readiness for continuous natural development, expansion, and enrichment.

The article examines comparative constructions in which humans are compared to inanimate objects and things. The following types of comparative images are highlighted: technological objects; household items; objects new to society; items of clothing, toiletries, and jewelry; food; objects associated with economic relations and material values; and the names of weapons and other military objects. It is noted that comparing humans to inanimate objects is one of the trends in the contemporary use of comparative constructions, which clearly reflects pragmatism and the concrete nature of modern life.